Products related to Judgment:
-
Judgment
THE NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLING AUTHOR 'STUNNING' Peter James. 'FANTASTIC' Martina Cole. 'TERRIFIC' Ian Rankin. 'TIMELY' Karin Slaughter. 'TWISTY' J.P. Delaney. 'EXQUISITE' David Baldacci. It was just one night. But it was a night that would destroy everything. Judge Juliana Brody is a woman with principles. She is happily married, she doesn't drink, she doesn't lose control.She definitely doesn't sleep with a handsome stranger at a law convention.Except that, last night, that is exactly what she did.Matias understands that if anyone found out about their one-night stand, it would destroy Juliana's marriage and, most likely, her career.They agree that they will never see each other again. And then, a week later, he walks into her courtroom.Julia knew that her latest brief, a high-profile sex discrimination case, would make her some powerful enemies.But she didn't expect her own life, and the lives of her family, to be put in mortal danger... 'Gripping, trenchant and human. One of the best novels I've read this year' Stav Sherez. 'Stunning... I cannot remember when I last read a book so gripping and so satisfying' Peter James. 'A masterclass in tension, with complex characters and a twisty plot' J.P.Delaney.
Price: 7.99 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £ -
Judgment
Fight for the truth and uncover the twisted crime running deep beneath the surface of Tokyo.
Price: 10.95 £ | Shipping*: £ -
Judgment Road
An outlaw motorcycle club sets up shop next door to Sea Haven in the dangerously sexy new series from #1 New York Times bestselling author Christine Feehan. A brutal education in a Russian training facility for assassins has taught this group of men one thing: It's a long road to redemption. As the enforcer of the Torpedo Ink motorcycle club, Reaper lives for riding and fighting.He's a stone-cold killer who turns his wrath on those who deserve it.Feelings are a weakness he can't afford-until a gorgeous bartender gets under his skin... Near Sea Haven, the small town of Caspar has given Anya Rafferty a new lease on life. And she's desperate to hold on to her job at the biker bar, even if the scariest member of the club seems to have it out for her.But Reaper's imposing presence and smoldering looks just ratchet up the heat.Anya's touch is everything Reaper doesn't want-and it brands him to the bone.But when her secrets catch up to her, Reaper will have to choose between Anya and his club-his heart and his soul.
Price: 9.99 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £ -
Lost Judgment
When a convicted police officer discloses the murder of the student teacher who bullied his son to suicide, the dark secrets of a Yokohama high school rise t...
Price: 19.55 £ | Shipping*: £
-
What is the difference between factual judgment and value judgment?
Factual judgment is based on objective, verifiable information and evidence, while value judgment is based on subjective beliefs, opinions, and personal values. Factual judgment can be proven or disproven with evidence, while value judgment is based on individual perspectives and cannot be objectively proven. Factual judgment is often used in scientific, logical, or empirical reasoning, while value judgment is often used in ethical, moral, or personal decision-making.
-
Is the judgment final?
Yes, the judgment is final. Once a judgment has been made by a court, it is legally binding and cannot be changed unless there are specific legal grounds for an appeal or modification. Parties involved in the case must abide by the judgment and its terms, and failure to do so can result in legal consequences. It is important to carefully consider the implications of a judgment before it is made, as it is difficult to reverse once it has been finalized.
-
What is the difference between a factual judgment and a value judgment?
A factual judgment is based on verifiable evidence and objective information, while a value judgment is based on personal beliefs, preferences, or moral principles. Factual judgments can be proven or disproven through evidence and logic, while value judgments are subjective and influenced by individual perspectives and values. Factual judgments deal with what is true or false, while value judgments deal with what is good or bad, right or wrong based on personal values and beliefs.
-
What is the difference between a regular judgment and a moral judgment?
A regular judgment is based on objective criteria, such as evidence, facts, and logic, while a moral judgment is based on subjective beliefs about what is right or wrong. Regular judgments are often made in legal or professional contexts, while moral judgments are more personal and based on individual values and ethics. Regular judgments are often used to make decisions in a fair and impartial manner, while moral judgments are influenced by emotions, cultural norms, and personal experiences.
Similar search terms for Judgment:
-
An Education in Judgment : Hannah Arendt and the Humanities
Rodowick takes after the theories of Hannah Arendt and argues that thinking is an art we practice with and for each other in our communities. In An Education in Judgment, philosopher D. N. Rodowick makes the definitive case for a philosophical humanistic education aimed at the cultivation of a life guided by both self-reflection and interpersonal exchange.Such a life is an education in judgment, the moral capacity to draw conclusions alone and with others, and letting one’s own judgments be answerable to the potentially contrasting judgments of others.Thinking, for Rodowick, is an art we practice with and learn from each other on a daily basis. In taking this approach, Rodowick follows the lead of Hannah Arendt, who made judgment the cornerstone of her conception of community.What is important for Rodowick, as for Arendt, is the cultivation of “free relations,” in which we allow our judgments to be affected and transformed by those of others, creating “an ever-widening fabric of intersubjective moral consideration.” That is a fragile fabric, certainly, but one that Rodowick argues is worth pursuing, caring for, and preserving.This original work thinks with and beyond Arendt about the importance of the humanities and what “the humanities” amounts to beyond the walls of the university.
Price: 23.00 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £ -
An Education in Judgment : Hannah Arendt and the Humanities
Rodowick takes after the theories of Hannah Arendt and argues that thinking is an art we practice with and for each other in our communities. In An Education in Judgment, philosopher D. N. Rodowick makes the definitive case for a philosophical humanistic education aimed at the cultivation of a life guided by both self-reflection and interpersonal exchange.Such a life is an education in judgment, the moral capacity to draw conclusions alone and with others, and letting one’s own judgments be answerable to the potentially contrasting judgments of others.Thinking, for Rodowick, is an art we practice with and learn from each other on a daily basis. In taking this approach, Rodowick follows the lead of Hannah Arendt, who made judgment the cornerstone of her conception of community.What is important for Rodowick, as for Arendt, is the cultivation of “free relations,” in which we allow our judgments to be affected and transformed by those of others, creating “an ever-widening fabric of intersubjective moral consideration.” That is a fragile fabric, certainly, but one that Rodowick argues is worth pursuing, caring for, and preserving.This original work thinks with and beyond Arendt about the importance of the humanities and what “the humanities” amounts to beyond the walls of the university.
Price: 31.00 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £ -
Critique of Judgment
“Pluhar maintains a fine, even tone throughout. . . . Those who have found the prospect of teaching the third Critique daunting will admire its clarity. . . . No one will be disappointed.” —Timothy Sean Quinn, The Review of Metaphysics Contents:Foreword.Translator’s Preface. Translator’s Introduction. Critique of Judgment. Preface. Introduction. I. Critique of Aesthetic Judgment. II. Critique of Teleological Judgment. Appendix: Methodology of Teleological Judgment. Translator’s Supplement: First Introduction to the Critique of Judgment. Selected Bibliography. Glossary. Index
Price: 27.99 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £ -
Judgment at Nuremberg
American courtroom drama directed by Stanley Kramer and featuring an ensemble cast that includes Spencer Tracy, Burt Lancaster, Montgomery Clift and Marlene Dietrich.Judge Dan Haywood (Tracy) presides over a military tribunal in Nuremberg ten years after the end of WWII tasked with deciding the fate of four German judges, including the highly respected Ernst Janning (Lancaster), accused of committing crimes against humanity.However, defence attorney Hans Rolfe (Maximilian Schell) argues that the German population is not solely responsible for enabling the horrors of the Nazi regime to take place and that the international community must also come under scrutiny.
Price: 18.99 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £
-
What is the value judgment and the factual judgment about the Crusades?
The value judgment about the Crusades is that they were a series of religiously motivated wars that resulted in significant loss of life and suffering, and were ultimately a negative and destructive force in history. The factual judgment about the Crusades is that they were a series of military campaigns sanctioned by the Latin Church in the medieval period, with the goal of capturing Jerusalem and other holy sites from Muslim control. The Crusades had a lasting impact on the political, social, and religious dynamics of Europe and the Middle East.
-
What is the difference between a value judgment and a factual judgment?
A value judgment is an opinion or assessment based on personal beliefs, preferences, or moral principles. It is subjective and reflects the individual's values and attitudes. On the other hand, a factual judgment is based on verifiable evidence, data, or observations. It is objective and can be proven or disproven through empirical evidence. In summary, the main difference between the two is that value judgments are based on personal values and beliefs, while factual judgments are based on objective evidence.
-
How long does the Day of Judgment and the Last Judgment last?
The Day of Judgment and the Last Judgment are concepts found in various religious traditions, including Christianity and Islam. In Christianity, the Last Judgment is believed to be the final judgment of all humanity by God, and it is said to occur at the end of time. The duration of the Last Judgment is not specified in Christian teachings. In Islam, the Day of Judgment is also the final assessment of humanity by Allah, and it is said to last for a period of 50,000 years according to Islamic tradition. However, the exact duration of the Last Judgment is ultimately a matter of faith and interpretation within each religious tradition.
-
Is learning programming and software development very challenging?
Learning programming and software development can be challenging for some people, as it requires logical thinking, problem-solving skills, and attention to detail. However, with dedication, practice, and the right resources, it is definitely achievable. Breaking down complex concepts into smaller, more manageable parts and seeking help from online tutorials, courses, and communities can make the learning process easier and more enjoyable. Ultimately, the level of challenge will vary depending on the individual's background, experience, and learning style.
* All prices are inclusive of VAT and, if applicable, plus shipping costs. The offer information is based on the details provided by the respective shop and is updated through automated processes. Real-time updates do not occur, so deviations can occur in individual cases.